According to @FarsideUK, Bitcoin ETF net flow was +$21.1 million on 2025-11-26, signaling modest net demand via ETFs for the day (source: @FarsideUK, https://farside.co.uk/btc). IBIT recorded +$42.8 million, FBTC saw -$33.3 million, ARKB added +$6 million, and GBTC gained +$5.6 million, while other funds were flat at 0 (source: @FarsideUK, https://farside.co.uk/btc). For traders, the small aggregate inflow and rotation from FBTC toward IBIT indicate marginal support for BTC spot liquidity without a broad risk-on impulse that day (source: @FarsideUK data, https://farside.co.uk/btc).

According to @FarsideUK, GBTC (Grayscale) recorded $0 million net flow today on its Bitcoin ETF Daily Flow tracker, signaling flat activity in the ETF flow metric. The cumulative flow for the session remains unchanged, according to @FarsideUK.

According to the source, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw approximately $1.2 billion in net outflows for the week, marking one of the worst weekly flow readings on record. According to the source, the outflows signal elevated redemption pressure and a weaker marginal bid from ETFs that can weigh on near-term BTC price momentum. According to the source, traders should monitor daily ETF flow prints and the correlation with BTC performance into next week to gauge whether risk-off conditions persist.

According to @EricBalchunas, US spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs recorded group-wide net inflows on Friday as other funds offset IBIT’s outflows, source: @EricBalchunas on X, Nov 22, 2025. According to @EricBalchunas, more than 95% of total ETF assets under management remained intact through the volatility, source: @EricBalchunas on X, Nov 22, 2025.

According to @AltcoinDaily, the question is whether experts overstated the BTC and global M2 linkage, and the data shows a regime-dependent relationship. Source: @AltcoinDaily. In 2020–2021, BTC rallied alongside a historic expansion in broad money across major economies and rising US M2, indicating a positive liquidity beta. Source: IMF International Financial Statistics broad money series; Federal Reserve FRED M2SL; CF Benchmarks Bitcoin Reference Rate. In 2022, US M2 turned negative year over year and global liquidity tightened, while BTC fell more than 60% from its peak, consistent with liquidity sensitivity. Source: Federal Reserve FRED M2SL; BIS Global Liquidity Indicators and Quarterly Review; CF Benchmarks Bitcoin Reference Rate. In 2023–2024, the correlation weakened as crypto-specific catalysts such as the approval of US spot bitcoin ETFs and a recovery in stablecoin free float supported BTC despite uneven broad money growth. Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission order approving spot bitcoin ETFs on Jan 10, 2024; Coin Metrics stablecoin supply data; BIS Quarterly Review. For trading, use global M2 as medium-term context but monitor near-term liquidity gauges including the Fed balance sheet (H.4.1), Treasury General Account and ON RRP, the dollar index and 10-year real yields, and aggregate stablecoin supply for directional signals. Source: Federal Reserve H.4.1 statistical release; U.S. Treasury FiscalData TGA; Federal Reserve Overnight Reverse Repo data; Federal Reserve trade-weighted dollar index; U.S. Treasury real yield series; Coin Metrics. Historically, BTC tends to perform when net dollar liquidity rises and the dollar weakens, so align risk with liquidity inflections and macro event dates. Source: Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury data; CF Benchmarks Bitcoin Reference Rate.

According to @GracyBitget, the U.S. government shutdown has been resolved and a bipartisan crypto bill placing oversight under the CFTC is taking shape, improving regulatory clarity for digital assets; source: X/@GracyBitget. She reports that spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $524M of net inflows yesterday, the highest in three weeks, signaling returning institutional capital; source: X/@GracyBitget. Economic Times adds that the shutdown deal lifted crypto market optimism and supported a BTC rebound, aligning with expectations that easing macro uncertainty can strengthen institutional confidence; source: Economic Times.

According to @cryptorover, Bitcoin just recorded the third-largest week of ETF outflows on record, highlighting weakening demand via ETF channels for BTC, source: @cryptorover on X, Nov 8, 2025. To keep BTC’s bullish structure intact, flows need to flip back to positive and narratives around ETFs and Treasury adoption need to return to support demand, source: @cryptorover on X, Nov 8, 2025. Trading takeaway: watch for a shift from red to green ETF flow prints as a trigger for bullish continuation in BTC, source: @cryptorover on X, Nov 8, 2025.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw total net outflows of $186.5 million on 2025-11-03, driven entirely by IBIT at -$186.5 million (source: Farside Investors on X, Nov 4, 2025; farside.co.uk/btc). According to @FarsideUK, FBTC, BITB, ARKB, BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, GBTC, and BTC each reported $0 net flow, making IBIT the sole contributor to the aggregate outflow on the day (source: farside.co.uk/btc). According to @FarsideUK, traders can use these daily US spot Bitcoin ETF flow prints as a high-frequency gauge of BTC demand and liquidity during US trading hours for positioning and execution (source: farside.co.uk/btc).

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw total net outflows of $179.2 million on 2025-10-31, led by IBIT at -$149.3 million, FBTC at -$12 million, and BITB at -$17.9 million (Source: Farside Investors on X; Farside ETF flow dashboard at farside.co.uk/btc). BRRR and HODL recorded $0 flows, while ARKB, BTCO, EZBC, BTCW, and GBTC were not specified in the post, with full details available on the dashboard for traders monitoring daily fund creations/redemptions and aggregate BTC demand via ETFs (Source: Farside Investors on X; Farside ETF flow dashboard at farside.co.uk/btc).

According to @FarsideUK, Bitcoin ETFs recorded the second-highest daily net inflows on record, as reported in their X post referencing their flows dataset on Oct 7, 2025. Source: Farside Investors on X (Oct 7, 2025). The post did not disclose the USD amount or a fund-by-fund breakdown, indicating only the day’s ranking for net inflows. Source: Farside Investors on X (Oct 7, 2025).

According to the source, Donald Trump’s stance moved from calling Bitcoin “not a fan” to engaging industry stakeholders, a shift documented from his July 2019 tweets to multiple 2024 policy signals, source: Donald J. Trump Twitter archive via U.S. National Archives, July 11, 2019; Reuters, May 21, 2024. In July 2019 he tweeted that Bitcoin is “not money” and linked it to illicit activity, marking his initial opposition to BTC, source: Donald J. Trump Twitter archive via U.S. National Archives, July 11, 2019. He later described Bitcoin as a “scam” in a June 2021 Fox Business interview, reinforcing a skeptical posture at that time, source: Fox Business interview, June 7, 2021. In May 2024 his campaign began accepting cryptocurrency donations via Coinbase Commerce, signaling increasing political adoption of digital assets, source: Reuters, May 21, 2024. In January 2024 he pledged to oppose a U.S. central bank digital currency, a concrete policy position relevant to private crypto alternatives, source: CNBC, January 17, 2024. In June 2024 he told U.S. Bitcoin miners he wants more BTC mined domestically, an explicit signal with direct implications for listed miners on power policy and permitting, source: Reuters, June 12, 2024. The SEC’s approval of multiple spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 broadened institutional access and set a backdrop where policy headlines can intersect with ETF flows and mining economics, source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, January 10, 2024; SEC Order approvals for spot Bitcoin ETFs.

According to the source, traders are centering their BTC playbooks on three verified drivers: miner economics after the April 2024 halving reduced the block subsidy to 3.125 BTC at height 840000, persistent on-chain fee pressure from inscription activity, and the liquidity impact of US spot ETF primary flows. Source: Bitcoin.org; mempool.space; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The halving mechanically lowered baseline miner revenue, increasing sensitivity to fee cycles and BTC price for hashprice and potential treasury adjustments observable in industry hashprice indices. Source: Bitcoin.org; Luxor Hashprice Index. Inscription-heavy periods have corresponded with sustained mempool backlogs and elevated sat/vB fees, affecting confirmation times and exchange batching strategies that can influence short-term on-chain settlement costs. Source: mempool.space. SEC approval of multiple spot Bitcoin ETFs on January 10, 2024 enabled creations and redemptions that coincide with substantial custodian inflows reported by issuers and with observed declines in exchange-held BTC during strong net inflow periods. Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; iShares IBIT issuer reports; Glassnode exchange balance dashboards. For trading, key signals to monitor include miner reserve and hashpower trends, daily spot ETF net creations or redemptions, and on-chain fee regimes alongside futures basis and open interest for leverage buildup risk. Source: CryptoQuant miner reserve metrics; issuer daily flow reports; mempool.space fee charts; CME Group futures data.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a weekly net flow of -$897.6 million, indicating redemptions exceeded creations across the complex (source: @FarsideUK). FBTC posted -$737.8 million, accounting for roughly 82% of the total net outflow, making it the largest single contributor to weekly redemptions (source: @FarsideUK). IBIT registered +$173.8 million in inflows, while ARKB saw -$123.3 million and BITB recorded -$92.4 million, highlighting mixed demand among the largest vehicles (source: @FarsideUK). Additional weekly flows were BTCO +$10 million, EZBC -$6.3 million, BRRR 0, HODL -$22.5 million, BTCW 0, GBTC -$84.6 million, and BTC -$14.5 million, rounding out the fund-level breakdown (source: @FarsideUK). In total, 7 funds had outflows, 2 had inflows, and 2 were flat, reflecting broad-based net redemptions this week (source: @FarsideUK). Excluding GBTC, aggregate net flow was still -$813.0 million, showing the week’s weakness was not concentrated solely in GBTC (source: @FarsideUK).

According to Farside Investors, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a weekly net inflow of $250.3 million. Source: Farside Investors. IBIT led the week with $434.3 million of inflows, while FBTC added $25.1 million and BTCO added $2.2 million. Source: Farside Investors. Outflows were concentrated in ARKB at -$81.5 million, BITB at -$76.9 million, and GBTC at -$69.7 million, with smaller outflows in HODL at -$13.2 million and EZBC at -$3.2 million, while BRRR and BTCW were flat at $0. Source: Farside Investors. The flow mix shows leadership from IBIT alongside rotation away from ARKB, BITB, and GBTC during the week. Source: Farside Investors.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net flow of -$23.2 million on 2025-08-22, indicating aggregate net redemptions for the day, source: @FarsideUK tweet Aug 23, 2025 https://twitter.com/FarsideUK/status/1959099578705142101 and data page https://t.co/Wg6Qpn0Pqw. On the day, IBIT posted the largest outflow at -$198.8 million, while ARKB +$65.7 million, FBTC +$50.9 million, HODL +$26.4 million, EZBC +$13.5 million, BITB +$12.7 million, and GBTC +$6.4 million provided partial offsets, source: @FarsideUK tweet Aug 23, 2025 https://twitter.com/FarsideUK/status/1959099578705142101 and data page https://t.co/Wg6Qpn0Pqw. BTCO, BRRR, BTCW, and BTC each reported 0 flow on the date, source: @FarsideUK tweet Aug 23, 2025 https://twitter.com/FarsideUK/status/1959099578705142101 and data page https://t.co/Wg6Qpn0Pqw. The negative total flow alongside concentrated IBIT redemptions and multi-issuer inflows is the key trading takeaway for BTC positioning on that session, source: @FarsideUK tweet Aug 23, 2025 https://twitter.com/FarsideUK/status/1959099578705142101 and data page https://t.co/Wg6Qpn0Pqw.

According to @FarsideUK, the Invesco US Bitcoin ETF recorded a daily net flow of 0 million US dollars in the latest Bitcoin ETF Daily Flow update. According to @FarsideUK, a 0 million reading indicates no net creations or redemptions for that day in their dataset. Source: @FarsideUK and farside.co.uk/btc/.

According to Farside Investors, the Franklin spot Bitcoin ETF recorded $0 million net flow on Aug 16, 2025, indicating flat investor demand at this issuer today. source: Farside Investors Zero net flow indicates no net creations or redemptions, implying no net primary-market BTC buys or sells by this ETF today. source: Farside Investors For broader trading context, monitor aggregate US spot Bitcoin ETF flows on the Farside Investors dashboard to assess ETF-driven BTC liquidity. source: Farside Investors

According to @rovercrc, U.S. news says 8% of Americans own Bitcoin (BTC). source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 11, 2025. However, the Federal Reserve’s latest Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2023 report shows 7% of U.S. adults held cryptocurrency as an investment in 2023, and 1% used it for purchases, with no coin-level breakdown such as Bitcoin specifically. source: Federal Reserve, Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2023 (SHED), published May 2024. For trading impact, this means verified U.S. retail participation is single-digit and investment-heavy, framing the addressable retail base for BTC alongside SEC-approved spot Bitcoin ETFs as a regulated access channel. source: Federal Reserve SHED 2023; source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, approval orders for spot Bitcoin ETFs, Jan 2024.

According to @fundstrat, Bitcoin ETFs have had a significant and direct impact on BTC price action due to actual spot purchases backed by ETF inflows. On-chain data from platforms like Glassnode confirm that ETF issuers are acquiring real BTC to match inflows, directly reducing circulating supply and supporting bullish momentum. Traders should note that skepticism about ETF impact is unfounded, and continued net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs could further tighten supply and drive volatility. This underscores the importance of monitoring ETF flow data for actionable trading signals in the crypto market (source: @fundstrat, Glassnode).

According to Crypto Rover, while retail investors are offloading their Bitcoin holdings, institutions are seizing the opportunity to purchase Bitcoin through spot ETFs. This behavior indicates a potential onset of a significant bull market, presenting a strategic buying opportunity for traders. Institutions' confidence in cryptocurrency, demonstrated by their ETF purchases, could drive future price increases. [Source: Crypto Rover]